Author terry.reedy
Recipients docs@python, techtonik, terry.reedy
Date 2011-04-08.23:10:17
SpamBayes Score 0.00055613
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1302304219.04.0.110922169366.issue11776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
All the types in the types module are, being types, potentially callable to produce instances of that type. But they are in types rather than builtins precisely because it is not expected that they be called directly. They are bound to names in types primarily for isinstance checks, and possibly issubclass checks. So none of their signatures are documented in types. It would be an anomaly to add something special for MethodType. So my first impulse is to close this. Do you have a source for your statement?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-08 23:10:19terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, techtonik, docs@python
2011-04-08 23:10:19terry.reedysetmessageid: <1302304219.04.0.110922169366.issue11776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-08 23:10:18terry.reedylinkissue11776 messages
2011-04-08 23:10:17terry.reedycreate