Author vstinner
Recipients Pablo.Bitton, abbot, astrand, belopolsky, brian.curtin, dmalcolm, filippo, gd2shoe, giampaolo.rodola, guettli, matthieu.labbe, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, ragnar, rnk, srid, tim.golden, vstinner
Date 2011-04-08.07:23:17
SpamBayes Score 0.000122863
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1302247398.65.0.854835343393.issue5673@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I fixed a bug in _communicate_with_poll(): raise an error if the endtime-time() is negative. If poll() is called with a negative timeout, it blocks until it gets an event.

New changeset 3664fc29e867 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #11757: subprocess ensures that select() and poll() timeout >= 0
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3664fc29e867

By the way, the doc modified by [c4a0fa6e687c] is still wrong: the timeout feature was introduced in 3.3, not in 3.2. And the change is not documented in Misc/NEWS.

@Reid Kleckner: Can you fix that? (I reopen this issue to not forget)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-08 07:23:19vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, guettli, astrand, belopolsky, orsenthil, pitrou, ragnar, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, abbot, gd2shoe, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, rnk, srid, matthieu.labbe, dmalcolm, filippo, Pablo.Bitton
2011-04-08 07:23:18vstinnersetmessageid: <1302247398.65.0.854835343393.issue5673@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-08 07:23:17vstinnerlinkissue5673 messages
2011-04-08 07:23:17vstinnercreate