Author rhettinger
Recipients eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, rhettinger, terry.reedy
Date 2011-04-03.18:27:10
SpamBayes Score 0.0320411
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1301855232.35.0.674535345471.issue9424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It probably would have been okay to remove assertDictContainsSubset which had nearly zero uptake (according to Google's code search).  That's probably because it addresses an uncommon use case, because it was only recently introduced, and because its arguments were in the wrong order.

That situation is much different that assertEquals and friends that have been around for a long time.

I don't care much how this gets resolved; just wanted to point-out that there is much less of a reason to keep assertDictContainsSubset..
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-03 18:27:12rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, michael.foord
2011-04-03 18:27:12rhettingersetmessageid: <1301855232.35.0.674535345471.issue9424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-03 18:27:10rhettingerlinkissue9424 messages
2011-04-03 18:27:10rhettingercreate