Message132633
+1 to the counter argument that "Unexpected Skips should not be marked as failures".
Also, I like the following proposal of giving better messages on skips
useful.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 07:53:34AM +0000, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> It's also possible to provide better skip messages, e.g.:
> -test_winreg skipped -- No module named 'winreg'
> -test_tk skipped -- No module named '_tkinter'
> -test_urllibnet skipped -- Use of the `network' resource not enabled
> +test_winreg skipped -- No module named 'winreg' (winreg is available on windows only)
> +test_tk skipped -- No module named '_tkinter' (tcl/tk not installed)
> +test_urllibnet skipped -- Use of the `network' resource not enabled (run the tests with -unetwork or -uall to enable it) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-31 03:48:22 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, brett.cannon, pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, akrpic77 |
2011-03-31 03:48:21 | orsenthil | link | issue10966 messages |
2011-03-31 03:48:21 | orsenthil | create | |
|