This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Justin.Cappos, bbangert, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, ned.deily, nicdumz, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, rosslagerwall, roysmith, stutzbach
Date 2011-03-30.18:54:43
SpamBayes Score 1.53753e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1301511282.3973.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> Antoine, absolument.  Please see attached file

Ah, thanks, I see. But this is not caused by this issue.
It seems to come from 12442ac3f7dd.

> Instead we should simply define it for python, and in accordance to
> established tradition, namely that defaulttimeout prevails.

That would be the second behaviour change in two versions. I think we
could/should simply fix the advertised behaviour, as in

> Btw, defaulttimeout(None) doesn't mean that that there is no default,
> it means that the default is "blocking."

Sure, but generally it means that the user didn't *set* a default at
Date User Action Args
2011-03-30 18:54:47pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, kristjan.jonsson, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, stutzbach, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos, rosslagerwall
2011-03-30 18:54:43pitroulinkissue7995 messages
2011-03-30 18:54:43pitroucreate