This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients brian.curtin, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou, sbt, tim.golden
Date 2011-03-21.20:40:46
SpamBayes Score 0.000541407
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1300740043.3516.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> Antoine:  I notice that even the fast path contains a ResetEvent()
> call.  I think this is a kernel call and so just as expensive as
> directly using a semaphore :)

Yes, in my timings it doesn't show significant improvements compared to
the semaphore approach (although again it's on a VM, so I'm not sure how
much this reflects a native Windows system).
Date User Action Args
2011-03-21 20:40:49pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, kristjan.jonsson, tim.golden, brian.curtin, sbt
2011-03-21 20:40:46pitroulinkissue11618 messages
2011-03-21 20:40:46pitroucreate