Message131397
> I am only suggesting a check for module because the is the only mistake > I remember anyone reporting. Passing a number as a base class gives a > > similar message, but no one does that. And as far as I know, there is > no way in general to detect whether a callable works as a metaclass > except by calling it with name, bases, and dict.
Since 3.x all the module names became lower-case and can be easily differ from class names, so I don't think this problem will present much in 3.x, right? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-19 06:22:30 | ysj.ray | set | recipients:
+ ysj.ray, terry.reedy |
2011-03-19 06:22:29 | ysj.ray | set | messageid: <1300515749.99.0.6579895832.issue11604@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-03-19 06:22:29 | ysj.ray | link | issue11604 messages |
2011-03-19 06:22:29 | ysj.ray | create | |
|