This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients Shay.Rojansky, terry.reedy
Date 2011-02-25.19:39:59
SpamBayes Score 2.2984261e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1298662800.58.0.267851669152.issue11245@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
imaplib has no particular maintainer and I know little about it.
Doc says it implements 'a large subset of the IMAP4rev1 client protocol as defined in RFC 2060." I do not remember any discussion on pydev, over the last several years, about imaplib. I presume just the subset was chosen because of some combination of necessity and feasibility, as judged by the implementors.  Hence the complement, the unimplemented subset, would be 'not done' rather than 'not wanted'. If your proposed new feature, an IDLE command, is part of this complement, then I would assume that a patch would, in principle, be acceptable.

I cannot comment on your particular proposal, but I hope the above helps as far as it goes.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-02-25 19:40:00terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, Shay.Rojansky
2011-02-25 19:40:00terry.reedysetmessageid: <1298662800.58.0.267851669152.issue11245@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-02-25 19:40:00terry.reedylinkissue11245 messages
2011-02-25 19:39:59terry.reedycreate