Author ysj.ray
Recipients eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, ron_adam, vstinner, ysj.ray
Date 2011-02-18.15:38:51
SpamBayes Score 1.2723e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1298043533.94.0.788213366537.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Can you add tests for "%.s"? I would like to know if "%.s" is different than "%s" :-)

Oh sorry~~  I made an mistake. There is no bug here. I have attached tests that show that '%.s' is the same as '%s'.


Here is the updated patch:
1, changed the function name unicode_format() to 
1, remove
"""
-                                 "must be a sequence, not %200s",
+                                 "must be a sequence, not %.200s",
"""
in Python/ceval.c

2, Removing using PySequence_GetSlice() in unicode_format_align() and do a refactor to optimize the process.

3, Add tests for '%.s' and '%s', as haypo wanted.


This is obviously not the final patch just convenient for other to do a  review. Something more need to be discussed.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-02-18 15:38:54ysj.raysetrecipients: + ysj.ray, lemburg, mark.dickinson, vstinner, eric.smith, ron_adam, ezio.melotti
2011-02-18 15:38:53ysj.raysetmessageid: <1298043533.94.0.788213366537.issue7330@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-02-18 15:38:52ysj.raylinkissue7330 messages
2011-02-18 15:38:51ysj.raycreate