Message126644
> It could be argued that this is incorrect, as it masks under-reads of
> stdin by the subprocess. However I believe a sanely-written subprocess
> ought to indicate success/failure back with its return code.
It seems quite orthogonal. The subprocess could have terminated successfully while not all of the stdin bytes were consumed; EPIPE informs you of the latter. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-20 20:27:00 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, dmalcolm |
2011-01-20 20:27:00 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1295555220.1.0.737843737875.issue10963@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-01-20 20:26:56 | pitrou | link | issue10963 messages |
2011-01-20 20:26:56 | pitrou | create | |
|