Message126197
> That complicates things quite a bit,
> especially given that it has to be grafted on at least two layers of the
> IO stack (the raw IO layer, and the buffered IO layer).
Also the TextIO layer I think.
> That's my opinion too. So, instead, of doing the above surgery inside
> the IO stack, the SocketIO layer could detect the timeout and disallow
> further access. What do you think?
So after a timeout occurs the file-object basically becomes worthless? Would it make sense to automatically call the close method of the file-object after this occurs? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-13 20:25:08 | rosslagerwall | set | recipients:
+ rosslagerwall, loewis, beazley, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, roysmith, pitrou, ned.deily, dabeaz |
2011-01-13 20:25:08 | rosslagerwall | set | messageid: <1294950308.72.0.636887108661.issue7322@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-01-13 20:25:02 | rosslagerwall | link | issue7322 messages |
2011-01-13 20:25:02 | rosslagerwall | create | |
|