Message125605
I wonder whether there is a precedent of some system mapping SIGINT to
an exception. We could probably learn something from them.
> - should KeyboardInterrupt always exit with SIGINT, or only if it was
> actually raised by a signal handler?
IMO, if we give the illusion that the interpreter was actually killed,
we should equate KeyboardInterrupt with SIGINT; any uncaught
KeyboardInterrupt should consequently always lead to raising SIGINT. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-06 23:44:06 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, mwh, gregory.p.smith, foom, pitrou, rnk |
2011-01-06 23:44:04 | loewis | link | issue1054041 messages |
2011-01-06 23:44:04 | loewis | create | |
|