Message125372
I think this patch (nonblock2.patch) is wrong. If I have a non-blocking server socket on *BSD, and do accept, with no default timeout: IIUC, under the patch, I will get a blocking connection socket. However, according to the operating system API, I'm entitled to get a non-blocking socket (i.e. O_NONBLOCK must be inherited across accept). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-04 22:10:07 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos, rosslagerwall |
2011-01-04 22:10:07 | loewis | set | messageid: <1294179007.28.0.5244445338.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-01-04 22:10:05 | loewis | link | issue7995 messages |
2011-01-04 22:10:05 | loewis | create | |
|