This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Justin.Cappos, bbangert, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, ned.deily, nicdumz, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, rosslagerwall, roysmith
Date 2011-01-04.22:10:05
SpamBayes Score 6.92142e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1294179007.28.0.5244445338.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think this patch (nonblock2.patch) is wrong. If I have a non-blocking server socket on *BSD, and do accept, with no default timeout: IIUC, under the patch, I will get a blocking connection socket. However, according to the operating system API, I'm entitled to get a non-blocking socket (i.e. O_NONBLOCK must be inherited across accept).
History
Date User Action Args
2011-01-04 22:10:07loewissetrecipients: + loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos, rosslagerwall
2011-01-04 22:10:07loewissetmessageid: <1294179007.28.0.5244445338.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-01-04 22:10:05loewislinkissue7995 messages
2011-01-04 22:10:05loewiscreate