Message125135
I like the logic of Antoine's patch much better (basing this on whether the listening socket had a timeout). I wonder whether it's correct though if there is a defaulttimeout: shouldn't it then leave the timeout on the socket instead? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-02 23:52:45 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, roysmith, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos, rosslagerwall |
2011-01-02 23:52:44 | loewis | set | messageid: <1294012364.96.0.87043740472.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-01-02 23:52:35 | loewis | link | issue7995 messages |
2011-01-02 23:52:35 | loewis | create | |
|