Message125130
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> You cannot have both: a safe implementation and the correct behavior with glibc
> (not Linux!) -- except if you start special-casing. Not sure that's worth it.
>
That's the reason why this and the related ctime issue were lingering
for so long.
My plan was to pick the low-hanging fruit (the null check) for 3.3 and
leave proper bounds checking and possibly switch to reentrant APIs for
the next release. There is a long tradition in keeping OS functions'
wrappers thin with an expectation that application programmers will
know the limitations/quirks of their target OSes. Given that datetime
module does not have these issues, I don't see this as "must fix." |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-02 23:43:16 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ Alexander.Belopolsky, georg.brandl, belopolsky, wsanchez, vstinner, ned.deily, Trundle, SilentGhost, sandro.tosi, l0nwlf |
2011-01-02 23:43:12 | Alexander.Belopolsky | link | issue8013 messages |
2011-01-02 23:43:12 | Alexander.Belopolsky | create | |
|