Author Alexander.Belopolsky
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, SilentGhost, Trundle, belopolsky, georg.brandl, l0nwlf, ned.deily, sandro.tosi, vstinner, wsanchez
Date 2011-01-02.23:22:42
SpamBayes Score 7.15508e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Georg Brandl <> wrote:
> (What I mean is that overwriting \n or not, the code is unsafe, so the check must be
> done beforehand.  Why should that be left to 3.3?)

Reading beyond a buffer is somewhat safer than writing, but I agree
that checks must be done before calling asctime/ctime.   I thought it
would have to wait because it is a feature.  Some Linux users may
expect year 10000 to work.  (Maybe as a sentinel value somewhere.)
But you are the RM, so it is your call.
Date User Action Args
2011-01-02 23:22:45Alexander.Belopolskysetrecipients: + Alexander.Belopolsky, georg.brandl, belopolsky, wsanchez, vstinner, ned.deily, Trundle, SilentGhost, sandro.tosi, l0nwlf
2011-01-02 23:22:42Alexander.Belopolskylinkissue8013 messages
2011-01-02 23:22:42Alexander.Belopolskycreate