Message125125
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> (What I mean is that overwriting \n or not, the code is unsafe, so the check must be
> done beforehand. Why should that be left to 3.3?)
Reading beyond a buffer is somewhat safer than writing, but I agree
that checks must be done before calling asctime/ctime. I thought it
would have to wait because it is a feature. Some Linux users may
expect year 10000 to work. (Maybe as a sentinel value somewhere.)
But you are the RM, so it is your call. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2011-01-02 23:22:45 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ Alexander.Belopolsky, georg.brandl, belopolsky, wsanchez, vstinner, ned.deily, Trundle, SilentGhost, sandro.tosi, l0nwlf |
| 2011-01-02 23:22:42 | Alexander.Belopolsky | link | issue8013 messages |
| 2011-01-02 23:22:42 | Alexander.Belopolsky | create | |
|
➜
