Author georg.brandl
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, doerwalter, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, vstinner
Date 2010-12-30.11:14:44
SpamBayes Score 4.61476e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
> I think the proposal is that fixing this minefield can wait until
> Python 3.3 (or even 3.4, or later).

That is what I was thinking.  (Alex: You might not know that Martin
was the main proponent of non-ASCII identifiers, so this assessment
should have some weight.)

> I'm thinking about an approach of a variable representation:
> one, two, or four bytes, depending on the widest character that
> appears in the string. I think it can be arranged to make this mostly
> backwards-compatible with existing APIs, so it doesn't need to wait
> for py4k, IMO. OTOH, I'm not sure I'll make it for 3.3.

That is an interesting idea.  I would be interested in helping out
when you'll implement it.
Date User Action Args
2010-12-30 11:14:53georg.brandlsetrecipients: + georg.brandl, lemburg, loewis, doerwalter, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, stutzbach, ezio.melotti
2010-12-30 11:14:53georg.brandlsetmessageid: <>
2010-12-30 11:14:45georg.brandllinkissue10542 messages
2010-12-30 11:14:44georg.brandlcreate