Author belopolsky
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, doerwalter, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, vstinner
Date 2010-12-30.02:50:39
SpamBayes Score 0.000857642
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTi==_UbPsAHGpcJVWokv+NhaBFkk54xmeyiRyE7b@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <AANLkTi=52uek6ByQSZ9E3aChYiQ15TukrDLKw9Mrcec3@mail.gmail.com>
Content
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> Given that until recently (r87433) the PEP and the reference manual
> disagreed on the definition,

Actually, it looks like PEP 3131 and the Language Reference [1] still
disagree.  The latter says:

identifier  ::=  id_start id_continue*

which should probably be

identifier  ::=  xid_start xid_continue*

instead.
[1] http://docs.python.org/py3k/reference/lexical_analysis.html#identifiers
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-30 02:50:43belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, loewis, doerwalter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, stutzbach, ezio.melotti
2010-12-30 02:50:39belopolskylinkissue10542 messages
2010-12-30 02:50:39belopolskycreate