Message124229
No, not specifically. My patch is conservative about what variables it recodes, yours more liberal, but it's difficult to say which is the better approach, or what PEP 3333 requires.
If you're happy with the current patch, go ahead, let's have it for 3.2; I don't foresee significant problems with it. It's unlikely anyone is going to be re-using the SSL_ or REDIRECT_ variable names for something other than what Apache uses them for. There might be some confusion from IIS users over what encoding REMOTE_USER should be in, but I can't see any consistent resolution for that issue, and we'll certainly be in a better position than we are now. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-12-17 16:59:28 | aclover | set | recipients:
+ aclover, pje, orsenthil, eric.araujo |
2010-12-17 16:59:28 | aclover | set | messageid: <1292605168.82.0.161814665109.issue10155@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-12-17 16:59:27 | aclover | link | issue10155 messages |
2010-12-17 16:59:27 | aclover | create | |
|