Author pitrou
Recipients barry, dmalcolm, laca, pitrou
Date 2010-12-09.19:25:27
SpamBayes Score 0.00771806
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1291922731.34.0.0931517118305.issue10663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The configure.in sets a default OPT of "-O" if none was set by the user, but I think that's wrong. The user could simply pass optimization flags as part of CFLAGS instead, and then the contents of OPT could conflict with that of CFLAGS (which is annoying to debug when you don't know what is happening exactly).

Besides, "-O" is hardly an useful default value for any compiler. I would advocate trimming down the magic and letting OPT empty/undefined if that's what the user asks for (and expects). What do you think?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-09 19:25:31pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, barry, laca, dmalcolm
2010-12-09 19:25:31pitrousetmessageid: <1291922731.34.0.0931517118305.issue10663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-12-09 19:25:28pitroulinkissue10663 messages
2010-12-09 19:25:27pitroucreate