Message123493
FWIW i tend to agree and would probably prefer setup/teardown to result in an error rather than be subsumed in an expected-to-fail marked test. I guess if one regards setup/teardown as a place to implement pre/post-conditions than the changes suggested by Michael make more sense. I'd like to see a more "real" use case / user than the abstract case provided here. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-12-06 19:06:16 | hpk | set | recipients:
+ hpk, r.david.murray, michael.foord |
2010-12-06 19:06:15 | hpk | set | messageid: <1291662375.96.0.872764569012.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-12-06 19:06:13 | hpk | link | issue10548 messages |
2010-12-06 19:06:13 | hpk | create | |
|