Message123385
2010/12/4 Thomas Vander Stichele <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Thomas Vander Stichele <thomasvs@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but why was it ok for this patch to move EXTENDED_ARGS from 143 to 145 ? I thought the numbers for opcodes were part of the ABI ?
Very much not. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-12-04 19:26:12 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients:
+ benjamin.peterson, pitrou, thomasvs |
2010-12-04 19:26:09 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue6101 messages |
2010-12-04 19:26:09 | benjamin.peterson | create | |
|