This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Retro
Recipients Retro, eric.smith, mark.dickinson
Date 2010-12-04.12:51:10
SpamBayes Score 4.5444346e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTin_0jQ2e7GVas_+mY0=SJia0c_yz8RsGN7M8GN9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1291465826.59.0.00736159073404.issue10621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Please do the move to complex_repr if everything then works the same (i.e.
nothing breaks the build) if the readability is in fact improved. Also,
change the docs and fix the tests. You know the drill.

P.S.: (1+2j) is worth changing to become (1 + 2j) in the future (in Python
3.3 if not sooner?). Is it very hard to do this? It's worth changing this.
Reasons like 'Readability counts.' come into mind...
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed Retro, 2010-12-04.12:51:10
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-04 12:51:12Retrosetrecipients: + Retro, mark.dickinson, eric.smith
2010-12-04 12:51:10Retrolinkissue10621 messages
2010-12-04 12:51:10Retrocreate