➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author lehmannro
Recipients Retro, belopolsky, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, lehmannro, lemburg, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2010-12-03.09:45:51
SpamBayes Score 8.222016e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1291369553.31.0.287534413433.issue10562@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> I wonder whether there are many examples where scientific data is written in a form that Python's complex() constructor couldn't currently read, but would be able to read if it accepted 'i' in place of 'j'.

I could not reproduce widespread real world issues with the syntax as it stands using Google Code Search (a mere 4 unique hits). http://goo.gl/sqMhY
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-03 09:45:53lehmannrosetrecipients: + lehmannro, lemburg, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, eric.araujo, Retro, michael.foord, brian.curtin
2010-12-03 09:45:53lehmannrosetmessageid: <1291369553.31.0.287534413433.issue10562@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-12-03 09:45:51lehmannrolinkissue10562 messages
2010-12-03 09:45:51lehmannrocreate