Author mark.dickinson
Recipients Retro, belopolsky, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, lemburg, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2010-12-03.08:00:18
SpamBayes Score 0.0622803
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1291363250.73.0.643619711906.issue10562@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Whether 1+2j is a literal or an expression is debatable.

Really?  I can't imagine what basis you'd have for calling either 1+2j or +1 a literal.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-03 08:00:50mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, lemburg, georg.brandl, rhettinger, belopolsky, pitrou, eric.araujo, Retro, michael.foord, brian.curtin
2010-12-03 08:00:50mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1291363250.73.0.643619711906.issue10562@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-12-03 08:00:18mark.dickinsonlinkissue10562 messages
2010-12-03 08:00:18mark.dickinsoncreate