Author pitrou
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, eric.smith, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach, terry.reedy, tim.peters
Date 2010-11-23.21:52:16
SpamBayes Score 1.45347e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1290549133.3642.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1290547843.3642.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> > I ended up loading my incremental patches in, but it's easy enough to
> > diff the base with the last patch.  If for some reasons it doesn't
> > work as conveniently as I expect, let me know and I will upload it to
> > Rietveld again as one big patch.
> I've started reviewing, and I must say that incremental patches would
> have made more sense if they didn't mutate each other's changes. Still
> reviewing though, thanks for the upload.

Ok, things are even worse: comments I've made to intermediate patches
have wrong URLs in the summary e-mail, so they don't point to the right
line numbers. Certainly a bug in Rietveld, but I'm not willing to do it,

Bottom line is that you're making too many gratuitous changes, including
style changes, and probably useless changes (Py_LOCAL_INLINE everywhere,
nitpicking over ISLT / IFLT...). Also, there's some strange complication
in some places which deserves comments and justification.

Next time, please upload a single patch. Really.
Date User Action Args
2010-11-23 21:52:18pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, collinwinter, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.smith, stutzbach
2010-11-23 21:52:16pitroulinkissue9915 messages
2010-11-23 21:52:16pitroucreate