Message122198
Why exactly are you skeptical? Because it doesn't fix everything in one go? The other changes are also minimal (I'm not even sure if it requires more source changes, maybe I have just to get my #defines right). If you prefer to see a single patch which you can reproduce to fix MinGW compilation completely, I'm willing to do that.
Given that 2.7 is supposed to be a long time support version, I really think people should have a chance to use MinGW. The patch is trivial, but figuring out everything from the compiler error messages can be brain bending. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-23 07:23:31 | jonny | set | recipients:
+ jonny, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, rpetrov |
2010-11-23 07:23:31 | jonny | set | messageid: <1290497011.78.0.698724178551.issue10504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-23 07:23:26 | jonny | link | issue10504 messages |
2010-11-23 07:23:26 | jonny | create | |
|