Message122182
Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Right, that wouldn't suit your present purposes. But apparently you
> are proposing to add a list sorting benchmark to the Tools directory,
> with lots of duplicated code from that repo...
Oh, I just stuck that under Tools because it was convenient for testing. The timing script is in a separate patch because I'm -0 on committing the timing script itself.
The perf.py that my timing script uses is based on the one from benchmarks/, but with 90% of the code removed, so the amount of duplicated code is less than it may at first appear.
My script could go in benchmarks/ if there was a convenient way for it to import perf.py. I wouldn't want to clutter the top-level directory with my script though. Any suggestions? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-23 00:23:33 | stutzbach | set | recipients:
+ stutzbach, tim.peters, collinwinter, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, eric.smith |
2010-11-23 00:23:33 | stutzbach | set | messageid: <1290471813.38.0.574204387061.issue9915@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-23 00:23:27 | stutzbach | link | issue9915 messages |
2010-11-23 00:23:27 | stutzbach | create | |
|