Message 122041 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	roysmith
Recipients	Justin.Cappos, bbangert, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, loewis, ned.deily, nicdumz, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, roysmith
Date	2010-11-22.00:24:30
SpamBayes Score	5.6863755e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1290385471.99.0.532583918386.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Responding to msg122013: I think he exactly meant to equate the two. The original problem described in issue882297 is that the makefile() documentation only stated that the socket could not be in non-blocking mode. The test case presented didn't appear to set non-blocking mode, it only set a timeout. The explanation by facundobatista was that setting a timeout inplies putting the socket into non-blocking mode, and the docs were updated to make this "non-blocking <==> timeout" relationship clear.

Responding to msg122013:

I think he exactly meant to equate the two.

The original problem described in issue882297 is that the makefile() documentation only stated that the socket could not be in non-blocking mode.  The test case presented didn't appear to set non-blocking mode, it only set a timeout.

The explanation by facundobatista was that setting a timeout inplies putting the socket into non-blocking mode, and the docs were updated to make this "non-blocking <==> timeout" relationship clear.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-11-22 00:24:32	roysmith	set	recipients: + roysmith, loewis, ronaldoussoren, exarkun, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, nicdumz, bbangert, Justin.Cappos
2010-11-22 00:24:31	roysmith	set	messageid: <1290385471.99.0.532583918386.issue7995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-22 00:24:30	roysmith	link	issue7995 messages
2010-11-22 00:24:30	roysmith	create