Message121948
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 17:11, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>>I can't see any situation in which redirecting
>> "/something?foo" to "/something?foo/" is the correct behaviour.
> As I explained, in the previous post, this would *not happen* in
> practical scenarios, because code won't reach that point for valid
> URLs.
It reaches that point in the tests I added, and the results confirm
the first two points in the original bug report. Am I mistaken?
"/something?foo" is a valid URL. If "/something" is translated to a
file on the filesystem, the content of that file is returned. If it is
translated to a directory on the filesystem, a 301 to
"/something?foo/" is returned. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-21 16:04:21 | jerith | set | recipients:
+ jerith, hfuru, orsenthil, vstinner |
2010-11-21 16:04:20 | jerith | link | issue10231 messages |
2010-11-21 16:04:20 | jerith | create | |
|