Message121449
> Looks like a reasonable proposal, but coding this in C is a chore.
It's not that bad. Most C code is a bit of a chore compared to Python but it really doesn't take much to write a C equivalent of: "functools.partial(%r, %s)" % (self.func, ', '.join(repr(a) for a in self.args)
> How hard/inefficient would it be to have 99% of partial
> coded in C and one stub in functools.py?
Let's not do this. There is too little benefit to warrant going down the path of splitting the code across two langauges. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-18 09:54:59 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, belopolsky, thomaslee, eric.araujo, stribb |
2010-11-18 09:54:59 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1290074099.12.0.562739923979.issue4113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-18 09:54:57 | rhettinger | link | issue4113 messages |
2010-11-18 09:54:57 | rhettinger | create | |
|