Author eric.araujo
Recipients belopolsky, docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, ron_adam
Date 2010-11-18.04:26:43
SpamBayes Score 1.01833e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
>> 1) I assume you have checked that this code does not produce two newlines (one in the string,
>> one from the print function or write method):

> Yes, it should be clear from the output that I presented above.
Okay, I had missed that.

> I think TextDoc.indent() takes care of the trailing '\n'.
What is take care?  Removing it?

> That won't work for maintenance branches. (I am not even sure docs are
> built for maintenance branches.)
3.1 and 2.7 docs are rebuilt.

> I am not so sure about micro-version
There is only one version* directive which uses a micro number.  It’s a bit unfortunate.

> If there was say latest/X.Y, I would use that.  Wait -
> there is:  Would you prefer that?
My point was that people used 2.7 docs even when developing for 2.6.
Date User Action Args
2010-11-18 04:26:45eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, georg.brandl, belopolsky, ron_adam, docs@python
2010-11-18 04:26:45eric.araujosetmessageid: <>
2010-11-18 04:26:43eric.araujolinkissue10446 messages
2010-11-18 04:26:43eric.araujocreate