Message121102
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:35:49AM +0000, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> This is unfortunately a backwards compatibility concern. Originally
> it wasn't made so that set() converts to string or accepts only
> strings and when the developers realized this mistake, it was too
> late (there were programs using this misfeature). That's one of the
Where would coercing to str() for set methods result in failures or
backward compatibility problems? I think get() methods always return
strings. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-13 01:18:21 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, eric.araujo, lukasz.langa, Felix.Laurie.von.Massenbach |
2010-11-13 01:18:20 | orsenthil | link | issue10387 messages |
2010-11-13 01:18:20 | orsenthil | create | |
|