➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients belopolsky, brett.cannon, eli.bendersky, terry.reedy
Date 2010-11-09.18:17:48
SpamBayes Score 0.0002641495
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Looks good in a cursory reading. I presume trace test still passes.

If you change the signature of the renamed functions, that would break the current wrappings. Would you use new private functions with different names, or change the wrappings where possible?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-09 18:17:49terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, brett.cannon, belopolsky, eli.bendersky
2010-11-09 18:17:49terry.reedysetmessageid: <1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-11-09 18:17:48terry.reedylinkissue10371 messages
2010-11-09 18:17:48terry.reedycreate