Message120678
Fixed the wordings in r86296(py3k), r86297(release31-maint) and r86298(release27-maint).
David, for the examples you mentioned, the first one's parsing logic follows the explanation that is written. It is correct.
For the second example, the port value not being a DIGIT exhibits such a behavior. I am unable to recollect the reason for this behavior.
Either the URL is invalid (PORT is not a DIGIT, and parse module is simply ignoring to raise an error - it's okay, given the input is invalid) or it needs to distinguish the ':' as a port separator from path separator for some valid urls.
I think, if we find a better reason to change something for the second scenario, we shall address that. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-07 13:22:01 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, georg.brandl, belopolsky, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, docs@python |
2010-11-07 13:22:01 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1289136121.25.0.718608734675.issue10226@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-07 13:21:58 | orsenthil | link | issue10226 messages |
2010-11-07 13:21:57 | orsenthil | create | |
|