Message 120448 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	loewis
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, loewis, mspacek, pitrou, tim.golden, vstinner
Date	2010-11-04.21:37:32
SpamBayes Score	0.0002578378
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4CD3279B.7020102@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to	<1288906119.67.0.611612929514.issue9611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Am 04.11.2010 22:28, schrieb Amaury Forgeot d'Arc: > > Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> added the comment: > >> Why do you think this would be somehow an example for a blocking stream >> that does not write all data without raising an exception? > Well, that's what "clamping" means, isn't it? Ah, then I misunderstood. We certainly should discard any data. I understood the proposal as rejecting write attempts for larger blocks with an exception.

Am 04.11.2010 22:28, schrieb Amaury Forgeot d'Arc:
> 
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amauryfa@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
>> Why do you think this would be somehow an example for a blocking stream
>> that does not write all data without raising an exception?
> Well, that's what "clamping" means, isn't it?

Ah, then I misunderstood. We certainly should discard any data.
I understood the proposal as rejecting write attempts for larger blocks
with an exception.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-11-04 21:37:34	loewis	set	recipients: + loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, brian.curtin, mspacek
2010-11-04 21:37:33	loewis	link	issue9611 messages
2010-11-04 21:37:32	loewis	create