Author pitrou
Recipients Christophe Simonis, Garen, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, devurandom, doko, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, jreese, lars.gustaebel, leonov, loewis, nicdumz, nikratio, ockham-razor, pitrou, proyvind, rcoyner, thedjatclubrock, vstinner, ysj.ray
Date 2010-10-29.07:00:36
SpamBayes Score 5.54942e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1288335633.3565.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> @pitrou: Why is this marked "Python 3.3"?  If the error handling in
> the C module is corrected, it's in a good enough shape to be committed
> before 3.2b1, and the remaining bugs ironed out until final.

I think it needs a real review before going in. Now if that review can
get done and the issues fixed before the beta, it's ok. By a quick look
at the code it seemed to need quite a bit of polish before being
acceptable for commit, but I might be mistaken.

(we should also avoid the multiprocessing syndrome where we rushed some
alpha-quality code just before the feature deadline and then had to fix
many issues in urgency. I do believe xz/lzma support is important in the
long term, though)

Oh, by the way, Per should agree to do maintenance directly against the
CPython repository. Please, no more externally-maintained modules (you
know what I'm talking about).
Date User Action Args
2010-10-29 07:00:40pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, georg.brandl, doko, amaury.forgeotdarc, arekm, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, nicdumz, eric.araujo, Christophe Simonis, rcoyner, proyvind, nikratio, leonov, devurandom, Garen, ysj.ray, thedjatclubrock, ockham-razor, jreese
2010-10-29 07:00:37pitroulinkissue6715 messages
2010-10-29 07:00:36pitroucreate