Author pitrou
Recipients alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, lemburg, pitrou
Date 2010-10-29.00:29:41
SpamBayes Score 0.10048
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1288312178.3753.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1288312008.44.0.129775752502.issue10093@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> If a new, unbound socket uses some form of OS resource, then a warning
> is needed. Is their an equivalent limitation like there is with file
> descriptors as to how many an OS can possibly have open at once?

A socket *is* a file descriptor (under Unix), so, yes, there is a limit.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-29 00:29:43pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, brett.cannon, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, alex, brian.curtin
2010-10-29 00:29:41pitroulinkissue10093 messages
2010-10-29 00:29:41pitroucreate