Author lemburg
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, lemburg, mark.dickinson, skrah, vstinner
Date 2010-10-20.22:29:25
SpamBayes Score 2.38431e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4CBF6D43.8060508@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <1287613484.67.0.0667865614901.issue10156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Stefan Krah wrote:
> 
> Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment:
> 
> To add to the mystery, the leak disappears if the key value is not
> interned in PyDict_SetItemString:

I'm not sure how you determine what is a leak and what not.
Interned Unicode objects stay alive until the interpreter
is finalized.

Are you suggesting that the finalization does not free the
interned Unicode strings or not all of them ?

> Index: Objects/dictobject.c
> ===================================================================
> --- Objects/dictobject.c        (revision 70459)
> +++ Objects/dictobject.c        (working copy)
> @@ -2088,7 +2088,6 @@
>         kv = PyUnicode_FromString(key);
>         if (kv == NULL)
>                 return -1;
> -       PyUnicode_InternInPlace(&kv); /* XXX Should we really? */
>         err = PyDict_SetItem(v, kv, item);
>         Py_DECREF(kv);
>         return err;
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-20 22:29:41lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, vstinner, skrah
2010-10-20 22:29:25lemburglinkissue10156 messages
2010-10-20 22:29:25lemburgcreate