Author ronaldoussoren
Recipients jaredlang, r.david.murray, ronaldoussoren, santagada
Date 2010-10-20.15:48:41
SpamBayes Score 1.23376e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <19C43D39-8842-4EC3-9E3A-1B3F75A6A6FE@mac.com>
In-reply-to <1287589300.13.0.686685764818.issue9670@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On 20 Oct, 2010, at 17:41, Leonardo Santagada wrote:

> 
> Leonardo Santagada <santagada@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
> Why not make it bigger so it doesn't crash for much bigger functions?

I don't mind making it bigger, but a larger size does come with a cost: the larger the initial stack size the less threads you can have without trashing the system (or running out of address space on a 32-bit build). 

I'm fine with increasing it to 1M, which is a nice round number build not larger. 

BTW. I haven't looked up the default stack size for the main thread on OSX.

Ronald
> 
> ----------
> nosy: +santagada
> 
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9670>
> _______________________________________
Files
File name Uploaded
smime.p7s ronaldoussoren, 2010-10-20.15:48:41
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-20 15:48:42ronaldoussorensetrecipients: + ronaldoussoren, r.david.murray, santagada, jaredlang
2010-10-20 15:48:41ronaldoussorenlinkissue9670 messages
2010-10-20 15:48:41ronaldoussorencreate