Message119044
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> We either needed to (1) add an unsigned Py_hash_t type or (2) just use size_t and Py_ssize_t.
>
Option (2) may actually be preferable because dict and set
implementations rely on Py_hash_t being compatible with Py_ssize_t.
See issue 1646068. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-10-18 17:31:52 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, ked-tao, benjamin.peterson |
2010-10-18 17:31:49 | belopolsky | link | issue9778 messages |
2010-10-18 17:31:49 | belopolsky | create | |
|