Author belopolsky
Recipients belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, casevh, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, ked-tao, lemburg, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, tim.peters
Date 2010-10-18.17:31:49
SpamBayes Score 8.9334e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTikkyE93+SDcTFyGUuwZy5GwafSYGdVELcsO0qRZ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1287422730.95.0.665646066397.issue9778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> We either needed to (1) add an unsigned Py_hash_t type or (2) just use size_t and Py_ssize_t.
>

Option (2) may actually be preferable because dict and set
implementations rely on Py_hash_t being compatible with Py_ssize_t.
See issue 1646068.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-18 17:31:52belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, ked-tao, benjamin.peterson
2010-10-18 17:31:49belopolskylinkissue9778 messages
2010-10-18 17:31:49belopolskycreate