Message118960
> That's another possibility, in which case we would first remove the
> current accept4-calling code in order to fix the buildbot failure.
In Python, the lowest layer facing the operating system always directly
exposes the API as-is, without reinterpreting the user's request. Not
following this principle leads exactly to this kind of problem.
So I think .accept() should only call accept(2), and accept4() should
only be called if explicitly requested by the application.
Exposing it as .accept4(flags) is certainly the most straight-forward
way of doing it, but I could also live with .accept(flags) (i.e.
call accept4 if flags are being passed, hoping that no other system
comes up with another accept extension that has a different integer
argument). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-10-17 18:25:00 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, doko, exarkun, pitrou, lekma, nvetoshkin |
2010-10-17 18:24:59 | loewis | link | issue10115 messages |
2010-10-17 18:24:57 | loewis | create | |
|