This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients belopolsky, benno, davidfraser, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, kiorky, loewis, vstinner
Date 2010-10-08.18:39:50
SpamBayes Score 0.0004632196
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>

Thank you for the updated patch, but since it implements a new feature, it cannot be applied to 2.x series.  I am +1 on removing year > 1900 limitation from datetime.strftime in 3.x, but you need to consider how this can be achieved in pure python datetime implementation which is now slated to be released in 3.2.  See msg110792 above.
Date User Action Args
2010-10-08 18:39:54belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, loewis, davidfraser, benno, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, kiorky
2010-10-08 18:39:53belopolskysetmessageid: <>
2010-10-08 18:39:52belopolskylinkissue1777412 messages
2010-10-08 18:39:50belopolskycreate