This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients barry, belopolsky, eric.araujo, jfinkels, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2010-09-22.01:47:39
SpamBayes Score 5.7975292e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1285120062.63.0.230288369105.issue9864@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, email6 should make use of datetime objects.  For email5 Antoine's proposal is better, but the question is will it happen before 3.2 beta :)
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-22 01:47:42r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, barry, belopolsky, pitrou, eric.araujo, jfinkels
2010-09-22 01:47:42r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1285120062.63.0.230288369105.issue9864@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-22 01:47:39r.david.murraylinkissue9864 messages
2010-09-22 01:47:39r.david.murraycreate