Message117070
> Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test be updated?
Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody
else speaking in favor of it being an error, I guess this is the way to
go: flush, on an ACCESS_COPY file, does nothing, and the test is fine
as it stands. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-21 15:28:06 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, tim.peters, nnorwitz, wheelrl, mdr0, sable, ajaksu2, BreamoreBoy |
2010-09-21 15:28:05 | loewis | link | issue678250 messages |
2010-09-21 15:28:05 | loewis | create | |
|