Author loewis
Recipients BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, loewis, mdr0, nnorwitz, sable, tim.peters, wheelrl
Date 2010-09-21.15:28:05
SpamBayes Score 2.76287e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4C98CF03.5000606@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1285080457.37.0.19793751033.issue678250@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test be updated?

Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody
else speaking in favor of it being an error, I guess this is the way to
go: flush, on an ACCESS_COPY file, does nothing, and the test is fine
as it stands.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-21 15:28:06loewissetrecipients: + loewis, tim.peters, nnorwitz, wheelrl, mdr0, sable, ajaksu2, BreamoreBoy
2010-09-21 15:28:05loewislinkissue678250 messages
2010-09-21 15:28:05loewiscreate