Message 116443 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, pitrou, stutzbach
Date	2010-09-15.12:39:57
SpamBayes Score	5.7374375e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1284554399.8.0.808961178011.issue9858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> +1 for a failing one. (Does the base implementation not raise?) The base implementation doesn't exist :) > Is it even possible to implement a real one without buffering? FileIO does. It's the same as read(), except that you read into an existing buffer rather than allocating a new bytes object.

> +1 for a failing one. (Does the base implementation not raise?)

The base implementation doesn't exist :)

> Is it even possible to implement a real one without buffering?

FileIO does. It's the same as read(), except that you read into an existing buffer rather than allocating a new bytes object.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-09-15 12:39:59	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach
2010-09-15 12:39:59	pitrou	set	messageid: <1284554399.8.0.808961178011.issue9858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-15 12:39:57	pitrou	link	issue9858 messages
2010-09-15 12:39:57	pitrou	create