Message 116183 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mattheww
Recipients	docs@python, jyasskin, mark.dickinson, mattheww, rhettinger
Date	2010-09-12.12:44:27
SpamBayes Score	2.4052208e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1284295469.83.0.35749936124.issue9802@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> (1) Shouldn't 'reverse=True' be omitted in the second doc > addition? Yes, of course, sorry. > (2) I'd also suggest adding a brief comment about what this > means for distinct, but equal, objects; otherwise it's not > really obvious what the point of the doc addition is. > (3) As a matter of clarity, perhaps replace "this is" with > "max(iterable, key=key) is", and similarly for min. I've attached a new patch incorporating these suggestions.

> (1) Shouldn't 'reverse=True' be omitted in the second doc
> addition?

Yes, of course, sorry.

> (2) I'd also suggest adding a brief comment about what this
> means for distinct, but equal, objects; otherwise it's not
> really obvious what the point of the doc addition is.

> (3) As a matter of clarity, perhaps replace "this is" with
> "max(iterable, key=key) is", and similarly for min.

I've attached a new patch incorporating these suggestions.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-09-12 12:44:30	mattheww	set	recipients: + mattheww, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, jyasskin, docs@python
2010-09-12 12:44:29	mattheww	set	messageid: <1284295469.83.0.35749936124.issue9802@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-12 12:44:28	mattheww	link	issue9802 messages
2010-09-12 12:44:28	mattheww	create