Author Red HamsterX
Recipients BreamoreBoy, Red HamsterX, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, pitrou, r.david.murray, sanxiyn
Date 2010-09-10.22:08:01
SpamBayes Score 1.38219e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1284156483.37.0.746233698078.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I agree that it does look like RFC 3548 implicitly denies the use of \r and \n. A few *very* simple tests also makes it look like ommitting them breaks nothing, but we'd need to add a test that includes them before applying the patch.

Other than that, I agree with everything and find the email6 notes intruiging.

Would you like me to update the patch, or do you want to do it?
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-10 22:08:03Red HamsterXsetrecipients: + Red HamsterX, amaury.forgeotdarc, sanxiyn, pitrou, ajaksu2, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, BreamoreBoy
2010-09-10 22:08:03Red HamsterXsetmessageid: <1284156483.37.0.746233698078.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-10 22:08:01Red HamsterXlinkissue1466065 messages
2010-09-10 22:08:01Red HamsterXcreate