Message 116049 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	Red HamsterX
Recipients	BreamoreBoy, Red HamsterX, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, pitrou, r.david.murray, sanxiyn
Date	2010-09-10.22:08:01
SpamBayes Score	1.382191e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1284156483.37.0.746233698078.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I agree that it does look like RFC 3548 implicitly denies the use of \r and \n. A few very simple tests also makes it look like ommitting them breaks nothing, but we'd need to add a test that includes them before applying the patch. Other than that, I agree with everything and find the email6 notes intruiging. Would you like me to update the patch, or do you want to do it?

I agree that it does look like RFC 3548 implicitly denies the use of \r and \n. A few *very* simple tests also makes it look like ommitting them breaks nothing, but we'd need to add a test that includes them before applying the patch.

Other than that, I agree with everything and find the email6 notes intruiging.

Would you like me to update the patch, or do you want to do it?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-09-10 22:08:03	Red HamsterX	set	recipients: + Red HamsterX, amaury.forgeotdarc, sanxiyn, pitrou, ajaksu2, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, BreamoreBoy
2010-09-10 22:08:03	Red HamsterX	set	messageid: <1284156483.37.0.746233698078.issue1466065@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-10 22:08:01	Red HamsterX	link	issue1466065 messages
2010-09-10 22:08:01	Red HamsterX	create