Message115598
Since Raymond has grabbed this, I will let him decide on its scope.
I agree with sectioning the operator doc and intended to suggest that.
The term 'in-place operation' is fine when accurate. The term 'in-place operator', which is what you wrote and what I criticized, is not as it is never accurate and has confused and mislead people. For one thing, it leads them to forget that augmented assignment statements are statements that *always* do an assignment. For another, they forget that the operation can only be in-place for mutables. That is my observation based on years of reading c.l.p./python-list. An 'in-place operator' would do an operation in-place without any assighment and would only work for mutables. Python has neither operators nor functions nor syntax with those characteristics. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-04 18:31:59 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, rhettinger, arno, docs@python |
2010-09-04 18:31:59 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1283625119.52.0.537123069419.issue9717@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-09-04 18:31:56 | terry.reedy | link | issue9717 messages |
2010-09-04 18:31:56 | terry.reedy | create | |
|