Author pitrou
Recipients brett.cannon, flox, giampaolo.rodola, michael.foord, pitrou
Date 2010-09-03.17:12:58
SpamBayes Score 3.72014e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1283533975.3223.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1283533717.01.0.456323752029.issue9754@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Why not accepting a tuple of warnings?

It already does (and there's a test!).

> That doesn't make sense for assertWarnsRegexp of course.

True.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-09-03 17:13:01pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, brett.cannon, giampaolo.rodola, michael.foord, flox
2010-09-03 17:12:58pitroulinkissue9754 messages
2010-09-03 17:12:58pitroucreate